Self-RAG: Learning to Retrieve, Generate, and Critique through Self-Reflection
Asai et al., 2024, Self-RAG (The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR 2024))
Subscriber deck — free during early access
2 cards in “5.1 Main Results” · whole deck
5.1 Main Results
- How did Self-RAG compare with other models?Across six tasks (fact verification, multiple-choice reasoning, open-domain QA, biographies, long-form QA with citations) it beat other open models with and without retrieval, and outperformed ChatGPT on several (e.g. PubHealth, PopQA, biographies), even surpassing it in citation precision on ASQA.
- Asai et al., 2024, Self-RAG (The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR 2024)), §5.1
- Why did standard retrieval-augmented baselines help little on some tasks?On tasks where the answer can’t simply be copied from a passage, such as PubHealth fact checking and ARC-Challenge reasoning, adding retrieved documents barely improved them, and most such baselines also struggled to cite accurately.
- Asai et al., 2024, Self-RAG (The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR 2024)), §5.1
Source
- Akari Asai, Zeqiu Wu, Yizhong Wang, Avirup Sil and Hannaneh Hajishirzi. 2024. Self-RAG: Learning to Retrieve, Generate, and Critique through Self-Reflection. In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR 2024). https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.11511