Self-RAG: Learning to Retrieve, Generate, and Critique through Self-Reflection

Asai et al., 2024, Self-RAG (The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR 2024))

Subscriber deck — free during early access

2 cards in “5.2 Analysis” · whole deck

5.2 Analysis

  1. What did Self-RAG’s ablations show?
    Training without retrieved passages or without the critic’s reflection tokens lost much performance; always using the top retrieved passage regardless of relevance (as in standard RAG) hurt PopQA and ASQA; dropping the IsSup score from beam search hurt ASQA.
    • Asai et al., 2024, Self-RAG (The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR 2024)), §5.2
  2. What trade-off does weighting the IsSup score expose?
    Raising its weight increased citation precision (claims backed by evidence) but lowered fluency (MAUVE), since longer, more fluent answers contain more unsupported claims; Self-RAG lets users pick the balance without retraining.
    • Asai et al., 2024, Self-RAG (The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR 2024)), §5.2

Source

  • Akari Asai, Zeqiu Wu, Yizhong Wang, Avirup Sil and Hannaneh Hajishirzi. 2024. Self-RAG: Learning to Retrieve, Generate, and Critique through Self-Reflection. In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR 2024). https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.11511