Self-RAG: Learning to Retrieve, Generate, and Critique through Self-Reflection
Asai et al., 2024, Self-RAG (The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR 2024))
Subscriber deck — free during early access
2 cards in “5.2 Analysis” · whole deck
5.2 Analysis
- What did Self-RAG’s ablations show?Training without retrieved passages or without the critic’s reflection tokens lost much performance; always using the top retrieved passage regardless of relevance (as in standard RAG) hurt PopQA and ASQA; dropping the IsSup score from beam search hurt ASQA.
- Asai et al., 2024, Self-RAG (The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR 2024)), §5.2
- What trade-off does weighting the IsSup score expose?Raising its weight increased citation precision (claims backed by evidence) but lowered fluency (MAUVE), since longer, more fluent answers contain more unsupported claims; Self-RAG lets users pick the balance without retraining.
- Asai et al., 2024, Self-RAG (The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR 2024)), §5.2
Source
- Akari Asai, Zeqiu Wu, Yizhong Wang, Avirup Sil and Hannaneh Hajishirzi. 2024. Self-RAG: Learning to Retrieve, Generate, and Critique through Self-Reflection. In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR 2024). https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.11511