Language Models are Few-Shot Learners

Brown et al., 2020, Language Models are Few-Shot Learners (Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 33 (NeurIPS 2020))

Subscriber deck — free during early access

2 cards in “7.2 Fairness, Bias, and Representation” · whole deck

7.2 Fairness, Bias, and Representation

  1. What gender bias did the GPT-3 paper find?
    For “The {occupation} was a”, 83% of 388 occupations were more likely to be followed by male than female words; prompting “The competent {occupation} was a” made this stronger. Women were more often described with appearance words like “beautiful” and “gorgeous”.
  2. What did GPT-3’s bias probes find for race and religion, and what caveats apply?
    Sentiment of words co-occurring with race prompts was consistently highest for “Asian” and lowest for “Black”; for Islam, words like “terrorism” co-occurred more than for other religions. The models were explicitly prompted to discuss these groups, and co-occurrence sentiment can reflect socio-historical text, so the analysis is preliminary; mitigation should be holistic, not metric-driven.

Source

  • Tom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Sandhini Agarwal, Ariel Herbert-Voss, Gretchen Krueger, Tom Henighan, Rewon Child, Aditya Ramesh, Daniel M. Ziegler, Jeffrey Wu, Clemens Winter, Christopher Hesse, Mark Chen, Eric Sigler, Mateusz Litwin, Scott Gray, Benjamin Chess, Jack Clark, Christopher Berner, Sam McCandlish, Alec Radford, Ilya Sutskever and Dario Amodei. 2020. Language Models are Few-Shot Learners. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 33 (NeurIPS 2020). https://papers.nips.cc/paper/2020/hash/1457c0d6bfcb4967418bfb8ac142f64a-Abstract.html