Centering: A Framework for Modeling the Local Coherence of Discourse

Grosz et al., 1995, Centering (Computational Linguistics)

Subscriber deck — free during early access

3 cards in “4 Claims of centering theory” · whole deck

4 Claims of centering theory

  1. What is the most fundamental claim of centering theory?
    To the extent a discourse adheres to centering constraints, its coherence increases and the inference load on the hearer decreases.
    • Grosz et al., 1995, Centering (Computational Linguistics), §4
  2. List the main claims of centering theory.
    A unique \(C_b\) per utterance; ranking of \(C_f\) by several factors; centering constrains realization (Rule 1); preferences among transition sequences (Rule 2); primacy of partial information (a semantic theory must allow partial interpretations); locality of \(C_b\) (chosen only from \(C_f(U_{n-1})\)); and center determination by a combination of discourse factors, not syntax or semantics alone.
    • Grosz et al., 1995, Centering (Computational Linguistics), §4
  3. What does “locality of \(C_b\)” mean?
    \(C_b(U_n)\) must come from \(C_f(U_{n-1})\), not from earlier utterances; if it seems to come from \(C_f(U_{n-2})\), that’s only because it is also in \(C_f(U_{n-1})\).
    • Grosz et al., 1995, Centering (Computational Linguistics), §4

Source

  • Barbara J. Grosz, Aravind K. Joshi and Scott Weinstein. 1995. Centering: A Framework for Modeling the Local Coherence of Discourse. In Computational Linguistics, pp. 203–225. https://aclanthology.org/J95-2003/