Annotation Artifacts in Natural Language Inference Data
Gururangan et al., 2018, Annotation Artifacts in Natural Language Inference Data (Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of ACL: Human Language Technologies, Volume 2 (Short Papers))
Subscriber deck — free during early access
2 cards in “3.2 Sentence Length” · whole deck
3.2 Sentence Length
- How does hypothesis length relate to the NLI label in SNLI?Neutral hypotheses tend to be long (median 9 tokens), entailments short (60% have 7 tokens or fewer). Half of hypotheses with at least 12 tokens are neutral, and about half of those with 5 or fewer are entailments, so length alone is a useful feature.
- Gururangan et al., 2018, Annotation Artifacts in Natural Language Inference Data (Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of ACL: Human Language Technologies, Volume 2 (Short Papers)), §3.2, p. 109
- What does word containment reveal about how entailed hypotheses were written?As bags of words, 8.8% of entailed SNLI hypotheses are fully contained in their premise, versus 0.2% of neutrals and contradictions, suggesting many entailments were written by deleting words from the premise.
- Gururangan et al., 2018, Annotation Artifacts in Natural Language Inference Data (Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of ACL: Human Language Technologies, Volume 2 (Short Papers)), §3.2, p. 109
Source
- Suchin Gururangan, Swabha Swayamdipta, Omer Levy, Roy Schwartz, Samuel R. Bowman and Noah A. Smith. 2018. Annotation Artifacts in Natural Language Inference Data. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 2 (Short Papers), pp. 107–112. License: CC BY 4.0. Flashcards adapted from this work. doi:10.18653/v1/N18-2017 https://aclanthology.org/N18-2017/