Lexicons for Sentiment, Affect, and Connotation
Jurafsky & Martin, Speech and Language Processing, 3rd ed. draft, ch. 23
6 cards in “23.2 Available sentiment and affect lexicons” · whole deck
23.2 Available sentiment and affect lexicons
- Name binary positive/negative sentiment lexicons.The General Inquirer (oldest, 1966, from content analysis), the MPQA Subjectivity lexicon (also labels strongly/weakly subjective), and the Hu & Liu (2004) polarity lexicon (from product reviews, bootstrapped from WordNet).
- Jurafsky & Martin, Speech and Language Processing, 3rd ed. draft, ch. 23, §23.2, p. 522
- What is the NRC VAD lexicon?Scores for valence, arousal and dominance for about 20,000 words (Mohammad 2018), e.g. high valence vacation, low torture; high arousal enraged, low napping; high dominance powerful, low weak.
- Jurafsky & Martin, Speech and Language Processing, 3rd ed. draft, ch. 23, §23.2, p. 522
- What is EmoLex?The NRC Word-Emotion Association Lexicon: binary associations of about 14,000 words with Plutchik’s 8 emotions plus positive/negative, e.g. reward: anticipation, joy, surprise, trust, positive.
- Jurafsky & Martin, Speech and Language Processing, 3rd ed. draft, ch. 23, §23.2, p. 522
- What does the NRC Emotion/Affect Intensity Lexicon add?Real-valued association scores (rather than binary) for anger, fear, joy and sadness, e.g. outraged is very high on anger, nurture very low.
- Jurafsky & Martin, Speech and Language Processing, 3rd ed. draft, ch. 23, §23.2, p. 523
- What is LIWC?Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count: 73 hand-built lexicons for social-psychological tasks, with categories like positive and negative emotion, anger, sadness, insight, inhibition, family, negation. Entries may be prefixes (
appreciat*).- Jurafsky & Martin, Speech and Language Processing, 3rd ed. draft, ch. 23, §23.2, p. 523
- What other hand-built affective lexicons exist besides sentiment?The General Inquirer’s dimensions (strong/weak, active/passive, overstated/understated; pleasure, pain, virtue, vice…) and concreteness ratings (Brysbaert et al.): crowdsourced 1–5 ratings, e.g. banana 5, belief about 1.
- Jurafsky & Martin, Speech and Language Processing, 3rd ed. draft, ch. 23, §23.2, p. 523
Source
- Daniel Jurafsky and James H. Martin. Speech and Language Processing. 3rd edition (draft). https://web.stanford.edu/~jurafsky/slp3/