Coreference Resolution and Entity Linking

Jurafsky & Martin, Speech and Language Processing, 3rd ed. draft, ch. 24

3 cards in “24.9 Winograd Schema problems” · whole deck

24.9 Winograd Schema problems

  1. What is Winograd’s classic example of hard coreference?
    “The city council denied the demonstrators a permit because they feared/advocated violence.” They is the council with feared and the demonstrators with advocated, requiring causal reasoning and world knowledge.
  2. What are the characteristics of Winograd Schema problems?
    Two parties; a pronoun that prefers one but could grammatically refer to either; a question asking which; changing one word flips the answer (“The trophy didn’t fit into the suitcase because it was too large/small”).
  3. What happened to the Winograd Schema Challenge with pretrained language models?
    A large share of the problems became solvable by fine-tuned pretrained LMs, which encode much world knowledge, so harder datasets were proposed (e.g. KnowRef).

Source