Conditional Random Fields: Probabilistic Models for Segmenting and Labeling Sequence Data
Lafferty et al., 2001, Conditional Random Fields (Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML))
Subscriber deck — free during early access
3 cards in “2 The label bias problem” · whole deck
2 The label bias problem
- Explain the label bias problem with the rib/rob example.A finite-state model branches at r into a path for rib (state 1) and one for rob (state 4). On input r i b, both states 1 and 4 have a single outgoing transition, so state 4 must pass on all its mass though it has rarely seen i: the two paths stay about equally likely regardless of the observations, and whichever word was slightly more frequent in training always wins.
States 1 and 4 each have one exit, so they ignore whether they see i or o - Lafferty et al., 2001, Conditional Random Fields (Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML)), §2
- What remedies did Bottou propose for label bias, and why are they unsatisfactory?Changing the state structure, e.g. collapsing states 1 and 4 to delay branching (determinization, not always possible and can explode combinatorially); or starting fully connected and letting training find structure, which discards valuable prior structural knowledge.
- Lafferty et al., 2001, Conditional Random Fields (Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML)), §2
- What property must a proper solution to label bias have?It must score whole state sequences at once, letting some transitions “vote” more strongly than others depending on the observations: score mass isn’t conserved, and transitions can amplify or dampen the mass they receive.
- Lafferty et al., 2001, Conditional Random Fields (Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML)), §2
Source
- John Lafferty, Andrew McCallum and Fernando C. N. Pereira. 2001. Conditional Random Fields: Probabilistic Models for Segmenting and Labeling Sequence Data. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), pp. 282–289.