Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks
Lewis et al., 2020, Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks (Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 33 (NeurIPS 2020))
Subscriber deck — free during early access
2 cards in “4.3 Jeopardy Question Generation” · whole deck
4.3 Jeopardy Question Generation
- What did human evaluation of Jeopardy question generation show?Against BART, RAG-Token was judged more factual in 42.7% of pairs vs 7.1% for BART (both factual in 17%), and much more specific. RAG-Token beat RAG-Sequence on Q-BLEU-1, perhaps because Jeopardy clues combine facts from several documents.
- Lewis et al., 2020, Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks (Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 33 (NeurIPS 2020)), §4.3
- How do parametric and non-parametric memory interact in RAG-Token?Generating a Hemingway clue, the document posterior peaks on the passage about “The Sun Also Rises” when the first title token is produced, then flattens: retrieved text cues the right knowledge, and BART’s parametric memory completes the title.
- Lewis et al., 2020, Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks (Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 33 (NeurIPS 2020)), §4.3
Source
- Patrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Piktus, Fabio Petroni, Vladimir Karpukhin, Naman Goyal, Heinrich Küttler, Mike Lewis, Wen-tau Yih, Tim Rocktäschel, Sebastian Riedel and Douwe Kiela. 2020. Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 33 (NeurIPS 2020). https://papers.nips.cc/paper/2020/hash/6b493230205f780e1bc26945df7481e5-Abstract.html