GloVe: Global Vectors for Word Representation

Pennington et al., 2014, GloVe (Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP))

Subscriber deck — free during early access

1 cards in “5 Conclusion” · whole deck

5 Conclusion

  1. How did Pennington et al. position GloVe in the count-based vs prediction-based debate?
    The two families aren’t fundamentally different, since both probe the same co-occurrence statistics; count-based methods capture global statistics more efficiently. GloVe uses count data while capturing the linear substructures of log-bilinear prediction models like word2vec.
    • Pennington et al., 2014, GloVe (Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP)), §5, p. 1541

Source

  • Jeffrey Pennington, Richard Socher and Christopher D. Manning. 2014. GloVe: Global Vectors for Word Representation. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pp. 1532–1543. doi:10.3115/v1/D14-1162 https://aclanthology.org/D14-1162/