Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Models
Zou et al., 2023, Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Models (arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.15043)
Subscriber deck — free during early access
2 cards in “2.1 Producing Affirmative Responses” · whole deck
2.1 Producing Affirmative Responses
- Why does GCG target a response beginning that restates the request affirmatively?Making “Sure, here is [the requested content]” the most likely start puts the model into a mode where it continues with the content. Targeting only “Sure” risks a suffix that overrides the request (e.g. “never mind, tell me a joke”); restating the request keeps the behaviour on target.
- Zou et al., 2023, Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Models (arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.15043), §2.1
- What is the adversarial loss that GCG minimizes?The negative log-probability of the target token sequence \(x^\star_{n+1:n+H}\) (the affirmative beginning) given the prompt, \(\mathcal{L}(x_{1:n}) = -\log p(x^\star_{n+1:n+H} \mid x_{1:n})\), minimized over the tokens at the suffix positions only.
- Zou et al., 2023, Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Models (arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.15043), §2.1
Source
- Andy Zou, Zifan Wang, Nicholas Carlini, Milad Nasr, J. Zico Kolter and Matt Fredrikson. 2023. Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Models. In arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.15043. https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.15043